Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 04:09

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
A Revolutionary Drug for Extreme Hunger Offers Clues to Obesity’s Complexity - KFF Health News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Is Russia’s evacuation of navy ships from Syria a sign of declining influence in the Middle East?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Can Djokovic climb the mountain? - Roland Garros
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How can we understand the mind of a Trump supporter?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Feature: 11 Games With 'Secret' Performance Bumps You Should Revisit On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can couples reverse the buildup of resentment once they notice it?